Hood’s frontal assault at Franklin in it’s historical context?

Historian and author Eric Jacobson describes John Bell Hood’s frontal assault at Franklin in it’s historical context for the Civil War and at Franklin.

 

About these ads

3 thoughts on “Hood’s frontal assault at Franklin in it’s historical context?

  1. B. Coats.

    Gen Hood was my GGG-grandfather, while he wasnt a great Army Commander, he was better at being a Corps Commander. i think loosing the arm at Gettysburg, and leg at Chickamagua, messed him up. he shouldve never ordered the “Pickett’s Charge of the West” on Nov. 30,1864.

    Reply
  2. Robert Collins

    Hood was one of several who still believed that a direct frontal assault was the way to win. Thanks to the advancements in weaponry and trench fortifications this manuever had gone the way of the spear and slingshot. The sad thing about it is that it would take another blood-letting contest (world war one) before most military minds finally realized this!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s