Another feature of the Google interactive map of the Battle of Franklin [found at: http://www.franklinbattlefield.com] is that we identify positions of artillery and fortifcations.

Ft. Granger looking south.

November 9, 2008 in Artillery, Franklin, Map | Tags: Fort Granger, Map
Another feature of the Google interactive map of the Battle of Franklin [found at: http://www.franklinbattlefield.com] is that we identify positions of artillery and fortifcations.

Ft. Granger looking south.


The 58th Indiana at Stone's River
New books for the Sesquicenttenial

| Daniel Graham Clark on Descendant? | |
| c. shoultz on 58th Indiana Infantry | |
| Anonymous on Descendant? | |
| Ken on 98th Ohio soldier writes about… | |
| Michael Cotten on Dr James A. North served in Co… |
The Battle of Franklin was fought on November 30, 1864 in Franklin, Tennessee; in Williamson County. John Bell Hood's Army of Tennessee (around 33,000 men) faced off with John M. Schofield's Army of the Ohio and the Cumberland (around 30,000 men). Often cited as "the bloodiest five hours" during the American Civil War, the Confederates lost between 6,500 - 7,500 men, with 1,750 dead. The Federals lost around 2,000 - 2,500 men, with just 250 or less killed. Hood lost 30,000 men in just six months (from July 1864 until December 15). The Battle of Franklin was fought mostly at night. Several Confederate Generals were killed, including Patrick Cleburne, and the Rebels also lost 50% of their field commanders. Hood would limp into Nashville two weeks later before suffering his final defeat before retreating to Pulaski in mid December. Hundreds of wounded Confederate soldiers were taken to the John and Carrie McGavock home - Carnton - after the battle. She became known as the Widow of the South. The McGavock's eventually donated two acres to inter the Confederate dead. Almost 1,500 Rebel soldiers are buried in McGavock Confederate Cemetery, just in view of the Carnton house.

1 comment
Comments feed for this article
December 23, 2010 at 10:00 am
Grant Cole, Tulsa
Kraig, Thank you so much for your effort in putting the battle from a new perspective. I recently read Ambrose Bierce’s comments; remembrances from his vantage point-I could not see how he might come to have viewed the Union position and works as a mere bridgehead. Your map allowed me to see that he was quite removed from the field of action. Bierce’s memory was keen, however when one considers the dust, smoke, and pall of mayhem that this massive contest raised would have further reduced his capacity to make accurate assessments of what was taking place. About every other source I’ve run across had similar views as that of General Pat Cleburne “They have three lines of works-and they are formidable. ”
Thanks again, Grant